Secure Security Products (Was: [fw-wiz] Ugh - fumbled again)

From: Frederick M Avolio (fred_at_avolio.com)
Date: 02/21/04

  • Next message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Allowing relay through Watchguard Firebox 1000" 
    To: Paul Robertson <proberts@patriot.net>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:42:20 -0500

    At 01:57 PM 2/21/2004 -0500, Paul Robertson wrote:
    >On a more interesting note, unlike times past, the last round of
    >Checkpoint bugs didn't seem to get more than a passing wave in a posting-
    >I'm wondering if we're just all immune to bug reports these days, or if
    >it's simply that patches aren't that big a deal anymore?

    Stop wondering and pose the question to this list! :-) Okay, I guess I just
    did. I think we just don't understand or care about the need for a security
    architecture for security products. (I discuss it briefly, at
    http://www.avolio.com/weblog/security/CheckPointVulnerabilities.html

    Fred

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

  • Next message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Allowing relay through Watchguard Firebox 1000"