Re: [fw-wiz] Vlan's as effective security measures?
From: avraham shir-el (arthur sherman) (avraham_at_jct.ac.il)
To: John Hall <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:58:07 +0200
do you know to what extent the problems you mention are relavent
for the ciso 2900xl, 3500xl and 2950 switches.
i'm aware of the config sec weaknesses on these switches, but not aware of
the extent to which the other issues are problems on these particular switches.
> FROM - John Hall <email@example.com>
> WHEN - 9 February 2004, 12:52
> SUBJ - Re: [fw-wiz] Vlan's as effective security measures?
> TO - LWare@e-one.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
> 1. A surprising number of network devices' VLAN implementations
> will leak packets between VLANs under heavy loads, or in some
> cases randomly all the time.
> 2, Some switches have a single forwarding database which includes
> VLAN tags and a host presenting a carefully chosen MAC address
> can sometimes hijack traffic for a host on another VLAN.
> 3. Some switches flood ARP requests across VLANs.
> 4. Some switches flood all traffic under heavy load.
> 5. Few switches and routers have adequate configuration security.
> Don't depend on VLANs to guarantee the separation of two networks
> that *must* be separated. Your security is only as good as the
> weakest element in your infrastructure and the security of most
> switches (and to a lesser extent routers) is pretty weak.
> Ware, Larry wrote:
> >Forgive a long out of field, and now working on getting back up to speed
> >firewall admin, but would someone care to educate me concerning the security
> >issues related to VLAN's? I have lots of them, and need to know why a VLAN
> >is not an effective adjunct to firewall and router security policies.
> firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards mailing list