RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple world connections into PIX

From: DCSIM Subscriptions (IA) (DCSIMSUBS_at_ia.ngb.army.mil)
Date: 02/06/04

  • Next message: Phil Burg: "[fw-wiz] Semi-OT: blade servers, backplanes, and DMZs"
    To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
    Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:31:49 -0600
    
    

    And therein lies the problem: routes are global.
    The capability for multiple routes is there for redundancy only, it seems.
    I was thinking that once the session is built the PIX would be smart enough
    to use the same interface for return traffic. So far I've been
    dissapointed.

    I guess IOS firewall would be a better choice for this situation, but the
    investment has already been made.

    - Lee

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Strydom, Willie [mailto:WStrydom@fnb.co.za]
    Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 00:12
    To: 'DCSIM Subscriptions (IA)'; firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple world connections into PIX

    you'll have top play with routing. I have seen a similar setup before, add
    routes to outside_1 and outside_2 for the hosts that you wanna send there.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: DCSIM Subscriptions (IA) [mailto:DCSIMSUBS@ia.ngb.army.mil]
    Sent: 28 January 2004 12:51
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Subject: [fw-wiz] Multiple world connections into PIX

    Greetings.

    I've run into an interesting problem on a PIX 515. Here's a makeshift
    diagram:

    Warning! ASCII art!

    outside_1
    --------------|-----| inside_1
                  | |-------
    outside_2 | PIX |
    --------------| |-------
    (Def. GW) |-----| inside_2

    LAN networks are NAT'd 10.x.
    "World" networks are real addresses.

    Effectively what I'm trying to do is make hosts on inside_1 use the
    outside_1 network and inside_2 hosts use outside_2. This would be
    considered policy routing on a Cisco router.

    So, when a connection is initiated from outside_1 to inside_1, it is built
    correctly, according to the log. However, when the return traffic is sent
    back through the PIX, it tries to go out the default gateway, which is
    outside_2, which does not have that connection established.

    I believe I have all the NAT rules and access lists correct, but the PIX
    keeps trying to use the same interface for outbound traffic.

    So far I have only tried to solve this in the PDM. I am hoping that there
    are some commands in the CLI that will solve my problem.

    Any ideas?

    - Lee
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    ____________________________________________________________________________
    _______________________

    The views expressed in this email are, unless otherwise stated, those of the
    author and not those
    of the FirstRand Banking Group or its management. The information in this
    e-mail is confidential
    and is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone
    else is unauthorised.
    If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
    or any action taken or
    omitted in reliance on this, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
    Whilst all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and integrity
    of information and data
    transmitted electronically and to preserve the confidentiality thereof, no
    liability or
    responsibility whatsoever is accepted if information or data is, for
    whatever reason, corrupted
    or does not reach its intended destination.

                                   ________________________________
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Phil Burg: "[fw-wiz] Semi-OT: blade servers, backplanes, and DMZs"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: dymanic route table problem
      ... Well that I can answer, each of the entries I see do correspond to a host within the outsourcing companies internal networks, jump stations used for administration, monitoring servers, so they are real. ... The issue is that all unknown routes are supposed to be sent to the default gateway to let the core routers handle the flow of traffic. ... These are three I see consistently and all are valid internal hosts to the outsourcer. ... And is only the systems that live on the same vlan that pix firewall for the outsourcer sits on, 167.126.101.101 is the internal interface for that device. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
    • Re: How to access hosts in other subnet
      ... hosts. ... Can I use a proper netmask with only single IP address to do so? ... You need routes to get to these networks. ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • Re: vpn redundancy PIX and 3000 series
      ... >So I was just reading up some more and found a setup for pix to pix ... a1) Was it broadcasting routing information directly to all the internal ... But this depends upon the 525 or 3xxx being able to broadcast routes ... e) the 525 stays up, the ISP WAN link stays up, but the router at ...
      (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
    • Re: Question on single host with mutiple subnets/gateways
      ... >> netmask and network routes, traffic should not go to default gateway ... > Sorry for my unclear description, here's the current routing table. ... This looks correct "if these are separate networks", ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • Re: Routing problem
      ... :So do i need to upgrade my PIX firewall? ... could not ping hosts that are on the dmz interface from some inside hosts. ...
      (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)