Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall
From: Ravi (ravivsn_at_roc.co.in)
Date: 01/22/04
- Previous message: Derito, Anthony G: "RE: [fw-wiz] [1/2 OT] Tool to "draw" network topology"
- In reply to: Don Parker: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Next in thread: DLN Krishna: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Reply: DLN Krishna: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: DLN Krishna <dlnk@intotoinc.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:19:37 +0530
Hi Krishna,
A simple solution I think of is to
- send emails to the user and to the administrator
- There will be two passwords: A master password and a normal password
- Normal password will be used to authenticate the user
- Master password will be used to change normal password
- The screen to enter passwords will be same to complicate life
- Master password can only be used once, after which the user has to
get it from admin
- On entering master password, you will be directed to a link
wherein you will change the normal password
On these lines
- If the attacker tries X times, the normal password become
useless/locked
- As the user also receives email of this event, it is assumed he
may take quick action before the admin ..( ultimately he Could be the
victim not the admin ;) )
- User with his master password changes his normal password
- Master password can only be used after normal password is locked
Drawbacks I can think of:
- It is a fact that passwords are always a weak link to security
- The attacker may spend all of his time only to block the user ;)
, first he tries for normal password locking and then when it is locked
tries for master password locking that results in entire blocking !!
Again to improve
- X should be random number less than a critical value say 20
- Once the normal password is locked, the user MUST login from a
diff IP address ( Attacker will not know this number X, so he MAY keep
on trying on the same PC )
- The logic should be: After normal password is locked, and again
attempts come from same IP then ignore all attempts even if genuine
unless admin clears this flag
Tell me if this OK, or we will work further to improve the security.
Thanks,
Ravi
Rendezvous On Chip (I) Pvt Ltd.,
Hyderabad
INDIA
Don Parker wrote:
>The lockout approach after n amount of failed logins is still the best imho.
>
> Sending an
>email to the sys admin about repeated failed attempts may just as easily not be
>addressed for as you say they are normally fairly busy. Though it could be a form of DoS
>as you say, the person doing it would still have to obtain valid user names to do so
>with. There is no silver bullet for this scenario unfortunately, but the lock out after
>failed attempts is still the best that I am aware of.
>
>Cheers
>
>-------------------------------------------
>Don Parker, GCIA
>Intrusion Detection Specialist
>Rigel Kent Security & Advisory Services Inc
>www.rigelksecurity.com
>ph :613.249.8340
>fax:613.249.8319
>--------------------------------------------
>
>On Jan 16, DLN Krishna <dlnk@intotoinc.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> In one of ASIAN countries, firewall criteria indicates that, if user
>tries to log into
> the firewall appliance for more than X number of times, appliance MUST
>not
> allow that user to log-in until the password of the user is changed.
>
> There is another school of thought that this type of behavior might become
> DoS for genuine users. It is possible that, the attacker might try to
>log-in
> multiple times with victim's user name and give wrong password. When
>this happens,
> victim will not be able to access, until his password is changed by
>Administrator.
> Administrator might take many hours to change the password and also
>this can
> become a big head-ache for administrator.
>
> I feel that, logging a message (or sending alert to the administrator)
>when
> log-in is not successful for X number of times with information such as
> source IP and source Port and user name, which is being used to log-in,
> would be good, over denying any further log-in attempts.
>
> I would appreciate, if somebody could shed some light on any better
> approaches to handle this.
>
>Thanks,
>Krishna
>CTO Office
>Intoto Inc.
>www.intotoinc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>***********************************************************************
>* D L N Krishna, dlnk@intotoinc.com
>* Intoto Inc. voice : (408)844-0480 Ext 332
>* 3160, De La Cruz Blvd, #100, fax : (408)844-0488
>* Santa Clara, CA - 95054
>***********************************************************************
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>firewall-wizards mailing list
>firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
><a href='http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-
>wizards'>http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>
>
>_______________________________________________
>firewall-wizards mailing list
>firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
>http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Derito, Anthony G: "RE: [fw-wiz] [1/2 OT] Tool to "draw" network topology"
- In reply to: Don Parker: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Next in thread: DLN Krishna: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Reply: DLN Krishna: "Re: [fw-wiz] Handling Invalid Login Requests in Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|