RE: [fw-wiz] Checkpoint vs. PIX blade
From: Melson, Paul (PMelson_at_sequoianet.com)
Date: 01/15/04
- Previous message: Allendes Fernando: "[fw-wiz] NAT inside a VPN between PIX and Cisco device"
- Maybe in reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] Checkpoint vs. PIX blade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Shimon Silberschlag" <shimons@bll.co.il>, <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:41:51 -0500
I'm not sure I understand what you're referring to when you say the PIX "blade type." Do you mean the FWSM blade for Cisco 7000 series routers, or do you mean the PIX rack-mountable chassis models? If you can clarify, perhaps I can better answer your question.
PaulM
> -----Original Message-----
> Hello group,
>
> I know that this issue was dealt with about 1.5-2 years ago,
> but since both
> products have advanced since, and I need to know about a
> particular type of
> PIX, namely the blade type, I would like to ask again.
>
> What are the pros/cons for each product, and what would be
> the preferred
> product for a data center type of setup? An answer from
> someone who've used
> both products in production environment is much appreciated.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Allendes Fernando: "[fw-wiz] NAT inside a VPN between PIX and Cisco device"
- Maybe in reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] Checkpoint vs. PIX blade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
