RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security
TSimons_at_Delphi-Tech.com
Date: 01/05/04
- Previous message: Mark Gumennik: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Next in thread: GChen_at_allianz.ca: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Maybe reply: GChen_at_allianz.ca: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Reply: Timo Proescholdt: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: morty@frakir.org Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:24:28 -0500
In our eyes the biggest design flaw is that there is no authentication prior
to the windows authentication. PCs in a locked office are more secure than
a Terminal Server out on the public internet... because you need a key to
get into the office.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mordechai T. Abzug [mailto:morty@frakir.org]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:48 AM
To: firewall-wizards@nfr.com
Subject: [fw-wiz] RDP and security
Anyone have any strong opinions on the security of RDP (Microsoft's
terminal server/remote desktop protocol)? Poking around on the net, I
see that they've had at least one design flaw that supposedly hasn't
been fixed (ie. server identification.) Any other design problems?
Thanks!
- Morty
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Mark Gumennik: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Next in thread: GChen_at_allianz.ca: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Maybe reply: GChen_at_allianz.ca: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Reply: Timo Proescholdt: "RE: [fw-wiz] RDP and security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]