RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls
From: Bill James (bubbagates_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/03/04
- Previous message: Bill James: "RE: [fw-wiz] port 27015"
- In reply to: David Pick: "Re: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'David Pick'" <d.m.pick@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:29:47 -0500
The problem with using ACL's is the load they can add to a router. Most
of Cisco's newer IOS' have IP Inspection and do OK but can add a
tremendous load on the router. I have seen problems with IP Inspection
process for smtp on IOS creating issues with the Domino Email server
(Lotus Notes) where a PIX and IPTables have no issues at all
Logging for a firewall based router leaves allot to be desired. I have
implemented Router, IPTables and PIX based firewalls and logging is
pretty good for both PIX and Iptables depending on the level you
choose....
At home I use IPTables for my firewall and have pretty good luck with it
Bill James
The objective of all dedicated employees should be to thoroughly analyze
all situations, anticipate all problems prior to their occurrence, have
answers for these problems, and move swiftly to solve these problems
when called upon.
However, When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to
remind yourself your initial objective was to drain the swamp.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
> [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf
> Of David Pick
> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 6:17 PM
> To: sd2mcleo@engmail.uwaterloo.ca
> Cc: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls
>
>
> There are several different "firewall" technologies that work
> at different layers in the protocol stack. One of these is
> "packet filtering" and router ACLs are just one particular
> implementation of this general technique. They are, in the
> real world, an important implementation because there are
> usually more routers than there are firewalls in a network
> and using this allows more conotrol points to be used and
> also allow for more depth to your defences.
>
> In the network I control at my place of work we're replacing
> Cisco routers by PCs running FreeBSD and IPFilter so that we
> can have better controls at more levels in the protocol stack
> than is provided by simple ACLs.
>
> --
> David Pick
>
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Bill James: "RE: [fw-wiz] port 27015"
- In reply to: David Pick: "Re: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|