Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft
From: George Capehart (capegeo_at_opengroup.org)
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: Carroll, Shawn: "RE: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- In reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: MHawkins@TULLIB.COM, mjr@ranum.com, breno@gamebox.net Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:23:49 -0500
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 10:15 pm, MHawkins@TULLIB.COM wrote:
> What do you call a monolithic representation of a predominantly
> identical membership within a group?
You know, I've been staring at this sentence for a while now. I
recognize *all* of the words, but when I try to parse that sentence my
parser blows up . . . is this a troll?
/g
-- George Capehart capegeo at opengroup dot org PGP Key ID: 0x63F0F642 available on most public key servers "It is always possible to agglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Carroll, Shawn: "RE: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- In reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]