Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft
From: Adam Shostack (adam_at_homeport.org)
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: Carroll, Shawn: "RE: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:26:43 -0500
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:44:43PM -0500, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
| about an analogy! :) The whole point is that we already have a rich
| enough vocabulary in computer security that we don't need to make up
| loaded analogies. The paper I gave the URL for earlier has some specific
| comments in which I attempt to demonstrate how the analogy is
| invalid - so I'll avoid them here.
Do you mean terms like "firewall" and "bastion host?" Or perhaps you
mean "containment" and "belt-and-suspenders?"
;)
-- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Carroll, Shawn: "RE: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
