RE: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall
From: Melson, Paul (PMelson_at_sequoianet.com)
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Maybe in reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Shimon Silberschlag" <shimons@bll.co.il>, <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:32 -0500
That depends on the firewall. If you implement a bridging firewall, then there should be no reason the routers need to know that anything has changed.
If inserting the firewall changes the path, then the obvious solution is to have the firewall use OSPF also (assuming it's supported). I don't want to say "no other way," but it does make sense.
PaulM
-----Original Message-----
Lets say that I have two routers (on an internal network) that talk OSPF
between them.
Now I have to insert a firewall in-between the two routers.
I am led to believe (by the Communications people I work with) that there is
no other option but to install OSPF on the firewall, which doesn't make me
feel easy about the solution.
Is it true that there is no other way around this problem?
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Maybe in reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OSPF on Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|