RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft
MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM
Date: 12/17/03
- Previous message: Dean Davis: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Authentication Question"
- Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Reply: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: mjr@ranum.com, breno@gamebox.net Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:15:47 -0500
What do you call a monolithic representation of a predominantly identical
membership within a group?
Mike H
-----Original Message-----
From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
[mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com]On Behalf Of Marcus J.
Ranum
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:58 PM
To: Breno Jacinto; Hawkins, Michael
Cc: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM -
sorry - Microsoft
>> Regarding monoculture, let me use a common analogy. My car is no more or
>> less secure than any other
Hang on a second!! "Monoculture" in *computing* is an analogy already!!
Don't use one analogy to try to bolster another one!!
Arguing by analogy is deceptive, since the choice of analogy can
conceal or distort information. Generally analogies are used to
illustrate - but they're only really useful if you're dealing with
concepts that nobody has established referents for. That's not
the case when computer security practitioners are talking with
other computer security practitioners.
I wrote a brief rant that explains some of my objections to the use
of "monoculture" analogy in computer security. See:
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/rants/monoculture.html
Anyhow, I think "monoculture" is a flawed analogy. Trying to use
an automotive analogy to explain away flaws is a flawed analogy
is too many levels of indirection for my taste! Why can't we just
talk about computer security when we're trying to talk about
computer security? ;)
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Dean Davis: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Authentication Question"
- Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Next in thread: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Reply: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] You'll never get fired for recommending IBM - sorry - Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|