Re: [fw-wiz] Rules for mailserver which is in internet zone ??

From: Jim Seymour (jseymour_at_LinxNet.com)
Date: 12/12/03

  • Next message: Melson, Paul: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Authentication Question"
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:29:08 -0500 (EST)
    
    

    Dilip M <dilipm@bristolindia.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > Consider that my mail machine is in internet zone and i do pop directly
    > from that machine.
    > What is a best rules to have on it to be secure??

    I'm guessing you mean, by that, that you want to access the machine
    from the outside? Via the Internet?

    I would move the POP server to a dedicated machine on a third network.
    E.g.:

      'net --- FW --- secure LAN
               |
               | semi-secure 3rd network
               |
              POP
             server

    for starters. That machine would be locked-down, running nothing *but*
    popd. (And smtpd--see following.)

    Secondly: You're going to need SMTP access to the same machine, no?
    Else how will clients *send* email? I don't think you want to poke a
    hole for SMTP through your firewall to your inside machine, on your
    "secure LAN," do you?

    Speaking of SMTP: No matter which way you handle that, how will you
    handle identification/authentication to make sure clients using your
    SMTP server are *yours*, and not a spammer/cracker (attempting to)
    abuse it? SMTP AUTH (along with some IP-based restrictions to at least
    broad network ranges, if possible) would be your friend there, I should
    think. Or at least POP-before-SMTP.

    This way, if your client email services machine is compromised, all
    that's at risk is your 3rd, not-quite-as-secure, network, rather than
    your secure LAN.

    Speaking of compromise: On the client email services machine, I'd use a
    set of services that allowed me to create client email services that
    didn't require local user accounts, such as the Cyrus IMAP server
    suite, perhaps.

    -- 
    Jim Seymour                | Spammers sue anti-spammers:
    jseymour@LinxNet.com       |     http://www.LinxNet.com/misc/spam/slapp.php
    http://jimsun.LinxNet.com  | Please donate to the SpamCon Legal Fund:
                               |     http://www.spamcon.org/legalfund/
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Melson, Paul: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Authentication Question"
  • Quantcast