Re: [fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY
From: Luca Berra (bluca_at_comedia.it)
Date: 11/22/03
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Re: [fw-wiz] Wayyy too many spoofed packets"
- In reply to: Dario Calia: "[fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Next in thread: Wes Noonan: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Reply: Wes Noonan: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:32:15 +0100
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:26:26PM -0800, Dario Calia wrote:
>Which PIX model do you have? The PIX supports static
>routing, Passive
>RIP and a very complete implementation of OSPF. What
Dario,
correct me if i am wrong, the major difference in using a pix instead of
a router would be that the pix does not forward packets on the same
interface?
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Re: [fw-wiz] Wayyy too many spoofed packets"
- In reply to: Dario Calia: "[fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Next in thread: Wes Noonan: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Reply: Wes Noonan: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX 500 as ROUTER ONLY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|