RE: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?
From: Dawes, Rogan (ZA - Johannesburg) (rdawes_at_deloitte.co.za)
Date: 10/10/03
- Previous message: Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. (Hons) G8TIC: "Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco PIX506 problem minxing VPN and NAT"
- Maybe in reply to: ark_at_eltex.ru: "[fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Next in thread: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Reply: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'ark@eltex.net'" <ark@eltex.net>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:05:36 +0200
You may want to look at www.imapproxy.org. Granted it is not exactly the
same thing, but it should provide some basic protocol handling code that
could be developed further.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ark@eltex.ru [mailto:ark@eltex.ru]
> Sent: 09 October 2003 01:41 PM
> To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am planning IMAP filtering proxy implementation. A quick
> look into rfc
> shows the IMAP protocol appears to be designed to maximize firewall
> application layer problems ;-). I mean it requires proxy to
> handle full
> email mime parsing, besides quite sophisticated protocol itself, thus
> making proxy very complex pile of code, comparable with IMAP
> server itself,
> which turns its security (through simplicity!) advantage questionable.
> And - there are numerous ways to retreive various parts of
> messages without
> handling message as whole; if content inspection means simple
> virus check
> with binary result (OK/BAD) it is not really a problem, but
> if we employ other
> content inspection types, it ruins the whole idea.
>
> I know here are many people on the list who know
> implementation details in
> depth, how do other vendors solve this problem? Is "best practice" now
> to just handle FETCH and UID FETCH commands syntax issued by
> widespread email
> clients and not to care if other techniques are used?
>
> p.s. for those interested in "fwtk sequel", i expect
> something like "public
> beta" to be finished before Samhain. ;-) i doubt i will
> include "real" imap4
> proxy, though :(
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | /
> _||_| |_ |_ |_
> (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _|
> | o |_||_||_|
> [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible?
> Hell,man,i've seen one!
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
Important Notice: This email is subject to important restrictions, qualifications and disclaimers ("the Disclaimer") that must be accessed and read by clicking here or by copying and pasting the following address into your Internet browser's address bar: http://www.Deloitte.co.za/Disc.htm. The Disclaimer is deemed to form part of the content of this email in terms of Section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002. If you cannot access the Disclaimer, please obtain a copy thereof from us by sending an email to ClientServiceCentre@Deloitte.co.za.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. (Hons) G8TIC: "Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco PIX506 problem minxing VPN and NAT"
- Maybe in reply to: ark_at_eltex.ru: "[fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Next in thread: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Reply: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] imap and content inspection?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|