Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 10/05/03
- Previous message: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Robertson: "[fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Next in thread: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Charles Miller <cmiller@pastiche.org>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 13:30:17 -0400
Charles Miller wrote:
>'To combat the problems with patch management, however, the company [Microsoft] is moving to a "securing the perimeter" strategy where it will partner with various firewall companies to ensure that electronic attacks don't even reach their intended targets but are instead thwarted at the edge of the network
One of the indicators of a security problem that has gotten out of
hand is a flip-flopping between firewalls and host security. :) I remember
a couple government agencies that went that route over the years.
- "We don't NEED a firewall, we have good host security!"
(they get hacked to pieces and finally can't hide it anymore)
- "We don't NEED host security, we have a good firewall!"
(they get trojaned, botted, and hacked to pieces and finally
can't hide it anymore)
- "We are going to use strong host security because we don't
need a firewall..."
(lather, rinse, repeat...)
Is there a real answer? I think that there is but Microsoft can't
give it because it's contrary to their business model. Linux can't
do it because it's contrary to its proponent's mind-sets. Maybe
Sony can do it through their Playstation sales unit. Basically,
the answer is to kill off general-purpose computing for 99.9%
of the desktops in the world. Really, it's not necessary for Joe
Average User (though Joe wouldn't agree). I think Schneier and
Geer et al were wrong when they wrote their little paper about
Microsoft monoculture being dangerous - they adopted a
disease model and, like most analogies, they let the analogy
steer their thinking. What we need is a monoculture but we
need to recognize that we're building one and make sure it
has a good immune system that can spread and share
immunity as fast (ideally faster!) than new cyberpathogens can
spread. But that's a topic for another day. ;)
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Robertson: "[fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Next in thread: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Personal Firewall Day?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|