Re: [fw-wiz] @Stake CTO fired for Microsoft comments

From: Paul Robertson (proberts_at_patriot.net)
Date: 09/26/03

  • Next message: Ryan M. Ferris: "Re: [fw-wiz] @Stake CTO fired for Microsoft comments"
    To: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@center.osis.gov>
    Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:45:52 -0400 (EDT)
    
    

    On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Joseph S D Yao wrote:

    > Dan's never been afraid to tell the truth. That @Stake fired him for
    > telling the truth, and such a well-known truth, says more about
    > @Stake's lack of integrity and love of MS $$$ than it does about Dan.

    I don't know Dan, so I can't comment on that part.

    @Stake is in some ways a competitor to TruSecure, so I'll try to avoid
    commenting on that part too.

    I think it's a damn shame that companies want the best of both worlds.
    I'm constantly butting into the marketing wall of death over things like
    e-mail addresses and corporate attribution- and I've successfully made the
    case for several years that companies I work for really, really don't want
    their domain on my public e-mails. The current compromise is adding that
    address to my .sig (I've also been somewhat worried about frivilous
    lawsuits, hence the .sig.)

    Security people almost have to take unpopular positions. If you're going
    to be honest about things, you're going to piss off a lot of vendors and
    quite a few indivduals too. Most of them can understand the rationale,
    even if they don't like the current instantiation.

    Much worse than knee jerk vendor reaction to criticism is knee jerk
    employer reaction to criticism of a third party. I don't think
    I'd want to work in that sort of environment.

    Homogenous networks are bad, and it's worse when your protection
    mechanisms are on the same platform as the resources. I wouldn't run a
    Windows firewall at a company with Windows desktops anymore than I'd run a
    Linux firewall at home if I was serious about security[1]. For instance,
    I know my Clavister firewall at home doesn't share any stack code with the
    Linux and BSD machines it's protecting, lessening a chance of a single
    problem affecting both my firewall and the protected clients[2].

    Paul
    [1] I wouldn't run a Windows firewall at home either though ;)
    [2] That doesn't mean I wouldn't run firewalling code on *BSD or Linux as
    well, just that I've got as much diversity as I can tolerate.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
    proberts@patriot.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
    probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Ryan M. Ferris: "Re: [fw-wiz] @Stake CTO fired for Microsoft comments"
  • Quantcast