[fw-wiz] CP Vs SonicWall Vs PIX Vs Netscreen Vs Symantec
bit_suryanto80_at_yahoo.com.sg
Date: 08/14/03
- Previous message: arnaud DUPUIS: "[fw-wiz] Blocking MS Blaster"
- Next in thread: Josh Welch: "RE: [fw-wiz] CP Vs SonicWall Vs PIX Vs Netscreen Vs Symantec"
- Reply: Josh Welch: "RE: [fw-wiz] CP Vs SonicWall Vs PIX Vs Netscreen Vs Symantec"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@nfr.net Date: 14 Aug 2003 04:23:18 -0000('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
Hello,
We are currently evaluating several remote firewall
devices for broadband usage:
Checkpoint VPN1-pro
SonicWall
PIX-515E-UR
Intrusions PDS
Netscreen 50
Symantec Gateway Security 5300
I've been poking around the net for some recent
comparisons and what not about the different platfomrs
to no avail so I've decided to approach the user
community.
There will be several hundred at least and I figure
that some folks out there may have some interesting
thoughts or comments on the different platforms that
may have escaped us. We are looking for the good, the
bad and the ugly. The critical issues are:
security issues of the individual platform
management issues (sw, firmware, policy)
mechanisms for managing virus sw revisions
dual vs triple interfaces
we'd like to separate "home" from "work"
thnx.u
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: arnaud DUPUIS: "[fw-wiz] Blocking MS Blaster"
- Next in thread: Josh Welch: "RE: [fw-wiz] CP Vs SonicWall Vs PIX Vs Netscreen Vs Symantec"
- Reply: Josh Welch: "RE: [fw-wiz] CP Vs SonicWall Vs PIX Vs Netscreen Vs Symantec"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]