RE: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool
From: Bojan Zdrnja (Bojan.Zdrnja_at_LSS.hr)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'R. DuFresne'" <dufresne@sysinfo.com>, "'Pollock, Joseph'" <PollockJ@evergreen.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:10:27 +1200
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
> [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf
> Of R. DuFresne
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 July 2003 5:38 a.m.
> To: Pollock, Joseph
> Cc: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool
>
>
>
> could not the fix for this client be a hardcoded hosts file?
>
> I've not mucked about alot with tcpd and compiling lately with the
> paranoid switches, but, this might be the way to do this 'quetly", of
> course resolv.conf need to point to files first on this system.
According to what Joseph wrote, *remote* site uses tcp wrappers.
This is not a client issue and hosts file has absolutely nothing to do with
it (unless I totaly misunderstood him).
Back on topic, I also see no reason why not to map PTR entries correctly, as
other people suggested.
Regards,
Bojan Zdrnja
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|