Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner...
From: R. DuFresne (dufresne_at_sysinfo.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- In reply to: Jim McAtee: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Next in thread: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Jim McAtee <jmcatee@mediaodyssey.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
[SNIP]
>
> Never understood running AV on servers. How would they get infected? Very
> little, if any, browser use is permitted on our servers and no email clients
> are ever run on them. Now, if we're talking about servers in a DMZ, such as
> web servers, compromises are always a possibility, but very few of those would
> be caught by an AV.
>
>
Think mounts and shares, and network served apps.
The server does not have to become sick and infected to be the source or
part of the problem, if it's serving up infected versions of files to
others that run or open them and trust their macros.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
-- Johnny Hart
testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- In reply to: Jim McAtee: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Next in thread: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|