Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner...
From: Paul Robertson (proberts_at_patriot.net)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] HTML Emails and Firewall Security"
- In reply to: Jim McAtee: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Jim McAtee <jmcatee@mediaodyssey.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:08:28 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jim McAtee wrote:
> Never understood running AV on servers. How would they get infected? Very
> little, if any, browser use is permitted on our servers and no email clients
> are ever run on them. Now, if we're talking about servers in a DMZ, such as
Obviously, it depends on the type of server, however (a) Administrators
will occasionally pop up a browser when researching a problem. (b) SQL
Slammer, NIMDA and Code Red should give enough history of server issues to
make installing AV worth-while on MS platforms. (c) If end-users connect
to them, then having professionally managed AV can stop things like laptop
infections from un-updated machines coming inside.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts@patriot.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] HTML Emails and Firewall Security"
- In reply to: Jim McAtee: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] OT: Av and Gartner..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|