Re: [fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend...
From: Joseph Steinberg (Joseph_at_whale-com.com)
Date: 07/29/03
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool"
- Maybe in reply to: Josh Welch: "[fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com, jwelch@buffalowildwings.com Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:37:36 -0400
Web-based remote access (SSL VPN etc.) can be secure if implemented
properly.
The incident mentioned in the article referenced below illustrates why you
need a "virtual shredder" that wipes all of the footprints from an access
device as part of any SSL VPN implementation.
Please see:
http://www.whalecommunications.com/kiosk
for a detailed explanation.
Joseph Steinberg
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:46:19AM -0500, Josh Welch wrote:
> Think of this when someone tries to tell you how "secure" web based remote
> pc applications are.
>
>
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/07/23/cybercafe.security.ap/index.html
>
> Josh
>
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] DNS records for a firewall NAT pool"
- Maybe in reply to: Josh Welch: "[fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] A little paranoia for the weekend..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]