Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities
From: Paul Ammann (pammann_at_execomm.net)
Date: 07/14/03
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- In reply to: lists_at_notatla.org.uk: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>, <lists@notatla.org.uk> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 17:29:07 -0700
> Get yourself on the list of the people notified when new boxes are
> built and old ones are retired. Make yourself helpful enough that
> people come to you rather than avoid you.
That's the blessing and curse of the company. The IT dept is 15 people. I
would be reporting to the Director and CIO. They both know security is need,
but they aren't sure where. For example, I know that the company doesn't
collect logs from its UNIX servers, routers, or firewalls. Servers need to
be hardened, but they lack knowledge and skills. Doing a traceroute to their
web site, I can see the firewall and router.
----- Original Message -----
From: <lists@notatla.org.uk>
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities
> From: Paul Robertson <proberts@patriot.net>
>
> > Obscurity won't help you much, keep your servers up to date,
> > especially if they're facing the real world, turn off all
> > the stuff that's not strictly necessary, and then you won't
>
> And organise routine ongoing monitoring with record-keeping.
> Get yourself on the list of the people notified when new boxes are
> built and old ones are retired. Make yourself helpful enough that
> people come to you rather than avoid you.
>
> Managers may leave various jobs unassigned - perhaps because they don't
> realise they need doing - and then they get done badly at last minute.
> That's when you get to hear about them and poeple whinge that they
> can't be reworked correctly because it's due right now. I haven't
> yet mastered this problem in my workplace. I've a suspicion some
> of these rush jobs may be deliberately so - but I border on paranoia.
>
> People need training - not everybody is a natural learner and those that
> are need time for that. I'm constantly amazed by the inability of staff
> to apply sensible filemodes on their work (typically with 1000 accounts
> per host). Some people seem to have a "I'm not a techy - I can't be
> bothered to do any of that" attitude that covers literally everything to
> do with computers. (I say that if this attitude persists they should get
> other jobs - but who listens to me ?) Proactive password checking has a
> high ROI.
>
> > > 2. The company has acknowledged they are lacking in security. What
> > > is the best method for doing a security audit?
>
> > Figure out what's exposed, make sure it's not anything that
> > shouldn't be, and make sure it's up to date, then ensure
> > that the security policy matches the needs and wishes of
> > the organization and make sure that it's being correctly
> > implemented.
>
> What's he going to do in the second week there ?
> Depending on size and culture most of the above steps could take
> forever. Keeping up to date is certain to remain unfinished.
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- In reply to: lists_at_notatla.org.uk: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]