Re: [fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool
From: Gregory Austin (greg_at_austinconsulting.com)
Date: 06/16/03
- Previous message: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] HTTPS, proxies, and remote developers."
- In reply to: SimonChan_at_lifeisgreat.com.sg: "[fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Next in thread: Ivan Arce: "Re: [fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Reply: Ivan Arce: "Re: [fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: SimonChan@lifeisgreat.com.sg, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:49:49 -0500
Simon,
You may want to take a look at the latest Information Security
magazine (June). There is an article about a product called CORE IMPACT
that purports to do what you're looking for. I personally have no
experience with the product, and it didn't get an especially good review
from the magazine, but if you're interested you can find the article
on-line at:
http://www.infosecuritymag.com/2003/jun/testcenter.shtml
Greg
>However, a VA tool is limited, in that it only stops at the vulnerability.
>
>I'm looking at a Pen Test tool that not only does the VA functionality but
>also exploit the vulnerability thus
>defining it as a real THREAT and not just a vulnerability.
>
>Is there a widely accepted tool on the market right now ?
>
>
==============================
Greg is, among other things, a moron.
Anything he has said above is solely his
own opinion, not that of his employer.
==============================
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] HTTPS, proxies, and remote developers."
- In reply to: SimonChan_at_lifeisgreat.com.sg: "[fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Next in thread: Ivan Arce: "Re: [fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Reply: Ivan Arce: "Re: [fw-wiz] VA vs PT tool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
