Re: [fw-wiz] Home Environment Cisco
salgak_at_speakeasy.net
Date: 05/29/03
- Previous message: Nathan: "RE: [fw-wiz] Home Environment Cisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: nathan.grandbois@cerdant.com, salgak@speakeasy.net, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:05:32 +0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan [mailto:nathan.grandbois@cerdant.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 07:57 PM
> To: salgak@speakeasy.net, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Home Environment Cisco
>
> But won't I be able to create an ACL based on ports in the IOS?
> I can harden the systems/services if I can just restrict ports, I don't need
> a firewall if I can do that.
Packet filtering by protocol offers some protection, but still is not a firewall. It may, however, play on on TV (g). It's a good security measure to limit protocols at the router level, but is not complete of and by itself...
> About how much are support contracts from Cisco? And if I get one does that
> only include the firmware, or do I get to bother a low level tech on the
> phone too?
Depends on the hardware and the contract. As I recall, there are varying levels of support.
In the long run, you'd still be better off with a upgraded firewall/router unit.. something in a NetScreen or SonicWall unit, a step up from the consumer DSL/Cable router/firewalls. . . .
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Nathan: "RE: [fw-wiz] Home Environment Cisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]