RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k
From: Noonan, Wesley (Wesley_Noonan_at_bmc.com)
Date: 05/29/03
- Previous message: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] help in firewall"
- Maybe in reply to: Monkman, Brian: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Crispin Cowan'" <crispin@immunix.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 08:27:36 -0500
> Noonan, Wesley wrote:
>
> >Got a business use for it? Until then, it doesn't matter how good it is,
> it
> >doesn't go through the firewall...
> >
> Some of the best real-time tech support for various open source software
> is available through public IRC channels:
>
Open it for those who need it (and only those who need it)... or don't use
open source ;-)
I think though, that the point has been adequately made that NAT is really
not enough, particularly if that remote site connects to a business in any
manner (be it VPN or traveling laptop). Thanks.
Wes Noonan, MCSE/CCNA/CCDA/NNCSS/Security+
Senior QA Rep.
BMC Software, Inc.
(713) 918-2412
wnoonan@bmc.com
http://www.bmc.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] help in firewall"
- Maybe in reply to: Monkman, Brian: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
