Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k
From: Crispin Cowan (crispin_at_immunix.com)
Date: 05/29/03
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "Re: [fw-wiz] traffic analysis"
- In reply to: Noonan, Wesley: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Noonan, Wesley" <Wesley_Noonan@bmc.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 16:48:07 -0700
Noonan, Wesley wrote:
>>What's wrong with irc? It is a good communication tool.
>>
>>
>Got a business use for it? Until then, it doesn't matter how good it is, it
>doesn't go through the firewall...
>
Some of the best real-time tech support for various open source software
is available through public IRC channels:
* #kernelnewbies , irc.oftc.net, www.kernelnewbies.org
* #redhat , irc.freenode.net
* #immunix on both irc.oftc.net and irc.freenode.net
Crispin
-- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Chief Scientist, Immunix http://immunix.com http://www.immunix.com/shop/ _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "Re: [fw-wiz] traffic analysis"
- In reply to: Noonan, Wesley: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|