RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k
From: Noonan, Wesley (Wesley_Noonan_at_bmc.com)
Date: 05/28/03
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Maybe in reply to: Monkman, Brian: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'ark@eltex.net'" <ark@eltex.net>, Paul Robertson <proberts@patriot.net> Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:10:09 -0500
> What's wrong with irc? It is a good communication tool.
Got a business use for it? Until then, it doesn't matter how good it is, it
doesn't go through the firewall...
> Even "out of the box" irc is not more insecure than widely-used ICQ.
> I even encourage users to use corporate IRC server as generic
> messaging tool. It is far better than using ICQ (with mirabilis servers
> usually!) as _really many_ companies that have no own IM system do.
Not an either/or situation in my mind. I don't care if irc is better or
worse than anything else. If I can't come up with a need for it, and I
personally can't, then it should be stopped at the firewall IMO.
NAT presents a false sense of security, and that alone makes it a bad
security choice.
Wes Noonan, MCSE/CCNA/CCDA/NNCSS/Security+
Senior QA Rep.
BMC Software, Inc.
(713) 918-2412
wnoonan@bmc.com
http://www.bmc.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Maybe in reply to: Monkman, Brian: "RE: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' networ k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|