RE: [fw-wiz] PIX, DNS fixups and Zone Transfers

From: Reckhard, Tobias (tobias.reckhard_at_secunet.com)
Date: 05/28/03

  • Next message: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
    To: Bruce Smith <bruce_the_loon@worldonline.co.za>
    Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 07:45:32 +0200
    

    Hi Bruce

    Just like Barney, I suggest you do away with NAT. I find it to be more of a
    pain than a gain in many, if not most situations.

    You could also switch to djbdns (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) and transfer
    your zones via rsync/ssh. Then the secondaries could strip out the private
    IP addresses with a simple sed command. Or the Makefile used to construct
    the DNS database on the primary could create two such databases, one for the
    primaries and one for the secondaries, by calling sed before tinydns-data.
    Such is the beauty of combining a non-monolithic DNS suite with UNIX, you
    can extend it in whatever way you wish. BTW, you could serve the second
    database via AXFR using axfrdns, too, of course, if your secondaries don't
    support anything else.

    tinydns also supports different records to be served based on the source IP
    address of the DNS client via RRs being tagged with location codes. This
    affects AXFR transfer as well, the AXFR client is passed only those records
    whose location codes match its IP address (as well as those records without
    any location codes). You could probably use this feature to do what you want
    while preserving NAT (shudder). Note, however, that djbdns' AXFR behaviour
    is slightly different from that of BIND in that it transfers the entire
    domain in question, including all subdomain data in the server's database,
    while BIND only transfers what amounts to the contents of the zone file in
    question (tinydns/axfrdns typically has only one database file and does not
    split zones to different files).

    Enough advocacy.

    Cheers,
    Tobias
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: ark_at_eltex.net: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"