Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network
From: Tina Bird (tbird_at_precision-guesswork.com)
Date: 05/28/03
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- In reply to: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Reply: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Paul Robertson <proberts@patriot.net> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 20:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Paul Robertson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Hugh Blandford wrote:
>
> > Please take into consideration that if they had a firewall, it would be
> > setup to allow all outbound traffic and let the 'responses' back in. There
>
> That's a silly and mostly specious pre-requisite. For instance, most
> small office users have *no* need for IRC, and given that IRC is *the*
> major control vector for trojaned machines, why the heck would you allow it
> outbound from a small office? Nuke 6667/tcp outbound and you decrease the
> chance of being owned rather significantly, and you break less than 1/2 of
> 1% of SOHO users.
if you continue down the road of "what things do i block to prevent most
attacks," please be sure to add the microsoft netbios and netbeui ports
(TCP/UDP 137-139, 445) -- at least at stanford, blocking those inbound and
outbound at our perimeter has prevented a great deal of grief.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- In reply to: Paul Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Reply: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [fw-wiz] Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|