Re: [fw-wiz] Evaluating Firewall

From: Mark Gumennik (mgumennik_at_mitre.org)
Date: 05/05/03

  • Next message: Jeffery.Gieser_at_minnesotamutual.com: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evaluating Firewall" 
    To: rkp@intotoinc.com
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:00:14 -0400

    Speed? - in mbps
    Proxy vs. packet filtering capabilities?

    Rama krishna prasad wrote:
    >
    > Hi Vineet,
    >
    > Other things which you may would like to consider are:
    > 1. Common attack detection and prevention.
    > 2. ALG Support (There are some applications that don't work
    > without ALG support such as H.323, FTP, RTSP, SQL*NET,
    > based on your requirement DNS for twice NAT)
    > 3. Performance.
    > 4. Flexible user interface.
    > 5. Type of NAT support.
    >
    > Analyze your security requirements and make sure that
    > firewall satisfies your needs. "
    >
    > From
    > RKP
    >
    > Vineet Mehta wrote:
    >
    > >Recently I was asked to evaluate Securepoint 3.0 firewall. On what basis
    > >one should evaluate this firewall? Some of the points i can think of
    > >are:
    > >
    > >1) Reports details/format
    > >2) Managebility
    > >3) Stability
    > >4) Modules/Features
    > >
    > >Any more points or detailed things I should consider in evaluating this
    > >firewall? Any suggestion is welcome.
    > >
    > >Thanks
    > >
    > >Regards,
    > >
    > >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > firewall-wizards mailing list
    > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

  • Next message: Jeffery.Gieser_at_minnesotamutual.com: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evaluating Firewall"
    Loading