RE: [fw-wiz] commercial va
From: Behm, Jeffrey L. (BehmJL@bvsg.com)
Date: 04/16/03
- Previous message: Andy Cuff [Talisker]: "Re: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Maybe in reply to: SimonChan@lifeisgreat.com.sg: "[fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL@bvsg.com> To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:01:53 -0500
Do you have any specifics on what got "freaked out?" by
nessus? I.E. what in particular should one be concerned
about? I would have to guess you are talking about running
it in the mode *without* the "safe-checks" box checked.
(I.E. only the banners are checked, and the actual exploit
is not actually attempted.)
Please enlighten me if I am astray.
At some point, Ben Nagy spewed:
> You should look at Retina as well. For freeware, Nessus is
> also cool, but I,
> personally, would be very careful running it on production
> networks (we
> often recommend that people use nessus as a complement to
> Retina, but it
> does have a habit of freaking out networks).
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Andy Cuff [Talisker]: "Re: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Maybe in reply to: SimonChan@lifeisgreat.com.sg: "[fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] commercial va"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|