Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole
From: George Capehart (capegeo@opengroup.org)
Date: 04/10/03
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: George Capehart <capegeo@opengroup.org> To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 21:13:01 -0400
Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
<snip>
> Everyone, across the board, has to do their
> job right. So do the customers.
Fair is fair. You're right. If the customers complained/sued, maybe it
would get someone's attention . . . ;-)
/g
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]