Re: [fw-wiz] Securing www server w/Oracle back end.

From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@wirex.com)
Date: 04/09/03

  • Next message: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
    From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@wirex.com>
    To: Ben Nagy <ben@iagu.net>
    Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 13:52:03 -0700
    

    Ben Nagy wrote:

    >>No holes have to be punched through the firewall from DMZ to
    >>private zone.
    >>
    >>
    >That seems unlikely. How do these two agents talk? Either they go through
    >the firewall or they bypass it using a serial connection / crossover cable,
    >USB, magic elves etc. Either is equivalent, in my book.
    >
    I inferred him to be saying that no *inbound* holes were punched
    (nothing outside can make a connection request to the inside) but that
    (in typical NATesque fashion) inside machines can make requests out, and
    the responses are allowed back in.

    So at layer 4, there are no holes in the firewall. But it is a semantic
    trick: if you want to compromise this system, you need only put malcode
    into some buffer that the inside machine will fetch while polling from
    the inside. That is more difficult than via a direct connection, but it
    is not (from this description) impossible.

    >>Theoretically the setup behaves like an air gap between the
    >>client and the web server and is transparent to both. On
    >>paper, this looks like a viable solution.
    >>
    >>
    >I think it's the phrase "air gap" that has me riled up, in fact....
    >
    I agree: when ever I see "air gap", I know that there is *hot* air
    involved. A *true* air gap is achieved with wire cutters; everything
    else is an application proxy of some kind, at best. Application proxies
    are *good*, but they are not magical complete solutions, and I'm much
    more inclined to believe the claims when they don't make appeals to
    phrases like "air gap."

    Crispin

    -- 
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.                      http://wirex.com/~crispin/
    Chief Scientist, WireX                    http://wirex.com
    HP/Trend Micro Immunix Secured Solutions
    http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/solutions/iis/
    			    Just say ".Nyet"
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: I am having connectivity problems
      ... firewall and turned ON Windows firewall. ... When I tried to install SP2 I was unable to get it thru Windows Update. ... does the connection problem persist? ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
    • Re: Serious Security Issue in Windows XP SP2s Firewall
      ... Subject: AW: Serious Security Issue in Windows XP SP2's Firewall ... If you update a WinXP SP-1 with enabled Internet ... Connection Firewall ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • RE: Serious Security Issue in Windows XP SP2s Firewall
      ... file and printer sharing is available for network login from any network (I ... Internet Connection Sharing of the PC has to be disabled." ... Serious Security Issue in Windows XP SP2's Firewall ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • Re: Still cant connect to RWW or OWA remotely
      ... No, I don't have a 3rd party firewall, and it's a pretty plain vanilla WinXP ... Connected to the network like the other workstations, ... I could go to any workstation and connect to them just fine. ... match the broadband connection, the two NIC firewall, the remote ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Big hole??
      ... > firewall then even they can't get in, ... > supposedly safe SP2 for Windows XP invites any Internet ... > Connection Sharing of the PC has to be disabled. ... > in fact is a common configuration and not a rare sight. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)

  • Quantcast