Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr@ranum.com)
Date: 04/06/03
- Previous message: Anton A. Chuvakin: "[fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- In reply to: Anton A. Chuvakin: "[fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Next in thread: Barney Wolff: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Barney Wolff: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Anton A. Chuvakin" <anton@chuvakin.org>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 14:59:37 -0400
Anton A. Chuvakin wrote:
>To clarify, imagine you have to have something that need to talk thru a
>firewall from a less secure compartment to a more secure one. And the
>options are: open TCP port XXXXX (to the required host only, of course),
>or tunnel over currently open (or proxied) port 80?
Both options have the same security properties - tunnelling is pretty
much exactly the same as opening a port, except that whatever does
the tunnelling may log the event. (Which your firewall can do in the case
of opening a port)
The real question is whether the tunnelling system provides _ANY_
security controls above and beyond ip/src/dest/logging. If not, then
they're 100% the same. If you can do some kind of content filtering
or control, then it might be worth it.
Protocol-over-protocol "attacks" mooted firewalls a loooooooong time
ago. We've just been cheerfully ignoring that fact. I was tunnelling
IP packets uuencoded over smtp back in the early 1990's (I guess
it would have been 1993 or -4) and got good enough RTTs that I
could even NFS-mount filesystems across a firewall once I had
tuned the NFS timeouts and retries correctly.
mjr.
--- Marcus J. Ranum http://www.ranum.com Computer and Communications Security mjr@ranum.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Anton A. Chuvakin: "[fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- In reply to: Anton A. Chuvakin: "[fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Next in thread: Barney Wolff: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Barney Wolff: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] tunnel vs open a hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|