RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall.
From: Ben Nagy (ben@iagu.net)
Date: 03/19/03
- Previous message: George J. Jahchan: "[fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- In reply to: George J. Jahchan: "[fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Next in thread: broyds@rogers.com: "Re: RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Maybe reply: broyds@rogers.com: "Re: RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ben Nagy" <ben@iagu.net> To: <Firewall-Wizards@Compucenter.org>, "'Firewall Wizards List'" <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:12:56 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
> [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf
> Of George J. Jahchan
[...]
> Is there a SPI firewall out there that is application-layer protocol
> aware?
Is there one that isn't?
(FTP can't work without layer 7 "awareness" for example)
Also, SPI is a Checkpoint word, and it is certainly L7 "aware" (whether
it uses this awareness to measurably increase security is another
question....)
Perhaps you could clarify exactly what you mean? I don't want to sound
glib, but the marketeers have made this kind of discussion treacherous
unless we all know that we're talking about exactly the same question.
ben
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: George J. Jahchan: "[fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- In reply to: George J. Jahchan: "[fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Next in thread: broyds@rogers.com: "Re: RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Maybe reply: broyds@rogers.com: "Re: RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 3-7 Firewall."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]