Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr@ranum.com)
Date: 03/18/03
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Maybe in reply to: Small, Jim: "[fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Small, Jim" <jim.small@eds.com>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:59:35 -0500
Small, Jim wrote:
>While talking about Firewalls and Proxies, I was asked, can you have a
>"Stateful Proxy"?
Back in the early days of firewalls "stateful" was a marketing term
applied to certain low-end firewalls in order to make their prospective
customers think that they did the same kind of things proxies did.
"Stateful" implied that the firewall kept state - like a proxy. I'd say
"stateful" is a subset of what a proxy does, so, yes, proxies are
stateful.
mjr.
--- Marcus J. Ranum http://www.ranum.com Computer and Communications Security mjr@ranum.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Maybe in reply to: Small, Jim: "[fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|