Re: [fw-wiz] Webex and the like

From: Paul D. Robertson (proberts@patriot.net)
Date: 02/25/03

  • Next message: Gene Yoo: "Re: [fw-wiz] Webex and the like"
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts@patriot.net>
    To: Steve Smith <sssmith@attglobal.net>
    Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 06:38:55 -0500 (EST)
    

    On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Steve Smith wrote:

    > I hope this subject hasn't been harped on too much - I just joined your

    Around December 2001 archives for the old firewalls list should give my
    perspective.

    > group. Our corporation has blocked access to GoToMyPC and Webex due to
    > security concerns. As a firewall administrator, I had to block the IP
    > range of both sites. We have taken a lot of slack about the Webex site, all
    > of them saying it is "so very safe, since
    > all traffic is originated inside, and the security very granular". We even
    > have a vendor that states Webex is their only way of supporting their
    > product. How does everyone else feel about/handle Webex andsimilar sites?

    Personally, I'd only open access for the duration of a support event if I
    had a vendor who had to use the product. I recall reading at some point
    somewhere about someone messing around and getting a different connection
    (not sure if it was on the vendor side or client side, and I don't have
    confirmation, but a google might turn it up.)

    In short, you're relying on (a) Vendor's support staff integrity (and
    potentially "just been given the opportunity to seek a new career" folks),
    (b) WebEx's server's security (which they didn't want to discuss in the
    thread I participated in without an NDA.

    Lastly, you might want to see if WebEx or vendors using it as a support
    vector are willing to insure any losses taken from that vector. Make sure
    they include current/former employees as well as 3rd parties. Vendors
    using it for support save some money, so I don't see where they shouldn't
    share the risk.

    Paul
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
    proberts@patriot.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
    probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards



    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Vendor wants remote control of our Servers and Workstations
      ... Of course the age-old problem with security is that ... Vendor has significant access to your internal ... this vendor uses the same method to support a number ... customer and makes significant changes ... ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: IIS-5.1 ISAPI dll - "The page cannot be displayed" after XP - SP2 install
      ... The vendor is still responsible for supporting their product. ... "Do you support product X on XPSP2". ... Received a response from the vendor. ... how can you verify that your ISAPI Extension is correctly configured? ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
    • [ARL02-A15] Multiple Security Issues in MyHelpdesk
      ... Vendor Homepage: http://myhelpdesk.sourceforge.net/ ... Vulnerability Type: Input Validation Error ... MyHelpdesk is a PHP/MySQL Helpdesk system based on the ... When a support assistant creates a new ticket, ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • SUMMARY: problems setting up mpxio
      ... The device must support the REPORT_LUNS SCSI command, ... It appears that these disks do not support the page 83 Device ID. ... Vital Product Data Pages Supported by Device /dev/rdsk/c0t25d0s2 ... Vendor Specific Page ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: Micro Focus Cobol / 2 Workbench For Sale
      ... with - within Micro Focus to get TIMELY ... development of IMS programs that are targeted for the mainframe for production. ... I do NOT see anything listed for "sysgen" support in the current dox. ... > Bottom line, it could not be used out of the box, even with vendor support ...
      (comp.lang.cobol)