Re: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time
From: Martin Peikert (Martin.Peikert@discon.de)
Date: 01/31/03
- Next message: Volker Tanger: "Re: [fw-wiz] What is the difference between stateful packet filtering and Stateful pkt inspection ?"
- Previous message: ark@eltex.ru: "Re: [fw-wiz] Proxy Firewalls (was FWTK vs T.REX)"
- In reply to: Reckhard, Tobias: "RE: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time"
- Next in thread: Reckhard, Tobias: "RE: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Martin Peikert" <Martin.Peikert@discon.de> Date: Fri Jan 31 11:22:37 2003
Reckhard, Tobias wrote:
> ntpd periodically (every hour, I believe) saves the current clock drift to a
From the man page: it's true what you - em, believe.
> drift file, typically /etc/ntp.drift. When the daemon starts, it initializes
> the drift of its state machine using the value in this file in an effort to
> speed up synchronisation (and especially it settling down). I believe it
> will apply this correction to the clock even when running in an
> unsynchronised state, i.e. when it can't reach any reliable peers or
> servers.
But in comparison to clockspeed, the ntp driftfile is written every hour
- a quite small amount of time to calculate the drift.
> You shouldn't make the typical mistake of configuring the local clock as a
Of course, you should read (and understand) the fine man page ;-)
>>| clockspeed uses a hardware tick counter to compensate for a
>>| persistently fast or slow system clock. Given a few time
>>| measurements from a reliable source, it computes and then
>>| eliminates the clock skew.
>
> Of course this only works as long as the clock skew is constant, resulting
> in linear drift if uncompensated. This is an OK assumption for quartzes
> running at fixed levels of temperature, such as the clocks in always-on
> servers in a thermally controlled server room. It is not OK for your typical
> workstation.
Didn't we talk about servers, firewalls IIRC, where logs are
time-critical? Anyway, if your servers are in a thermically controled
room (as I thope they are ;-), clockspeed will do the job.
>>| Typical success story: I started clockspeed on one of my Pentium
>>| computers at home on 1998-05-05. I ran sntpclock (through a 28.8
>>| dialup line) once on 1998-05-05 and once on 1998-05-30. On
>>| 1998-08-22, after no network time input for nearly three months, the
>>| clock was just 0.21 seconds off.
>
> This rating is rather subjective, of course. .21 seconds equates to 210 ms,
Right, I never said anything contrary. It's not my opinion, it's a quote
from djb`s site and I'm sorry if I didn't indicate that in that way that
everybody could see that at once.
>>So, if a firewall can't reach an NTP server a longer time, I would
>>think that you really have a problem ;-) But for a sufficient length
>>of time clockspeed will do the job and keep the time from drifting
>>too far...
>
> Could be that ntpd will, too.
Could be? Could be that ntpd will _not_. Are you sure or not?
> I myself prefer to have a stratum 1 source in the management network that
Yeah, that's what I prefer, too. But then I do not have to worry about
external ntp servers and setting time and date on any of my servers - if
I had a stratum 1 source in my network, I would never need anything
_like_ clockspeed. But that wasn't the assumption of Ben Nagy I answered:
Ben Nagy wrote:
> If a firewall can't reach an NTP server because of some transient
> network condition the clock doesn't automatically go haywire - it will
> just startdrifting as per the normal accuracy of the hardware clock,
> no?
So, I just wanted to give the hint that clockspeed is able to do a good
job if there is *temporarily no ntp source available*.
> Of course, when faced with The Real World (TM) this setup often
> remains a dream..
ACK.
GTi
- Next message: Volker Tanger: "Re: [fw-wiz] What is the difference between stateful packet filtering and Stateful pkt inspection ?"
- Previous message: ark@eltex.ru: "Re: [fw-wiz] Proxy Firewalls (was FWTK vs T.REX)"
- In reply to: Reckhard, Tobias: "RE: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time"
- Next in thread: Reckhard, Tobias: "RE: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|