Re: [fw-wiz] Stats on how common NAT is?
From: Daniel Linder (dan_linder@yahoo.com)
Date: 12/16/02
- Next message: Eye Am: "[fw-wiz] PIX 520 - control traffic between DMZ and inside devices"
- Previous message: ark@eltex.ru: "[fw-wiz] multiple reverse PTRs and fqdn-based ACLs"
- In reply to: Michael Still: "[fw-wiz] Stats on how common NAT is?"
- Next in thread: Michael Still: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stats on how common NAT is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Daniel Linder <dan_linder@yahoo.com> To: Michael Still <mikal@stillhq.com>, fw-wiz <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Mon Dec 16 17:40:03 2002
--- Michael Still <mikal@stillhq.com> wrote:
> I work as a software developer, and there has been some discussion at
> work
> as to how common NAT is in corporate environments (this affects
> whether we
> use DCOM or not).
If the one end of your DCOM connection is to be hosted at an ISP, there
is a good chance that the ISP has additional charges for a "live"
address (non-NAT). If the ISP is handing out non-RFC1918 addresses to
everyone who comes in, they will have a much harder time getting
additional address space from ARIN when they need to expand.
Dan
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Next message: Eye Am: "[fw-wiz] PIX 520 - control traffic between DMZ and inside devices"
- Previous message: ark@eltex.ru: "[fw-wiz] multiple reverse PTRs and fqdn-based ACLs"
- In reply to: Michael Still: "[fw-wiz] Stats on how common NAT is?"
- Next in thread: Michael Still: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stats on how common NAT is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
