Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking
From: David Pick (d.m.pick@qmul.ac.uk)
Date: 11/27/02
- Next message: Stephen Gill: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Previous message: David Klein: "RE: [fw-wiz] Problem getting vpn to work between netscreen 208 an d cisco 1721"
- In reply to: Pearsall, Jim: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Next in thread: Stephen Gill: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com From: David Pick <d.m.pick@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Wed Nov 27 17:45:20 2002
>
>
> >> My concern is that the "fan-out" boxes are typically run-of-the-mill
> >> switches, like Cisco Catalysts, that probably have been design without
> >> any security aspirations. I wouldn't be surprised if those switches
> >> could be attacked and tricked into leaking packets between VLANs.
>
> >A valid concern. My attitude is simple:
> >* If the switches are secure enough to keep VLANs seperated for
> > normal traffic then they're secure enough to use as interfaces
> >to your firewall
> >* If they're not, well, they're not!
>
> I would submit that secure enough to manage traffic inside your trusted
> network is quite different from secure enough to define a security
> boundary.
I'm sorry, I probably wasn't explicit enough in what I said. What
I should have said was that I didn't think the fact that there
was a firewall involved mattered at all here; if a switch was
judged secure enough to have *all* the VLANs involved (internal
*and* external/dangerous) connected to it (and that's another
argument about which *I*'m very conservative as well!) *then*
the fact that a firewall is connected to the switch is not
relevant; in the same way if it it judged that one group of
VLANs can share switch fabric then a firewall interconnecting
them can use a trunk link to that switch fabric with no further
loss of security.
-- David Pick
- Next message: Stephen Gill: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Previous message: David Klein: "RE: [fw-wiz] Problem getting vpn to work between netscreen 208 an d cisco 1721"
- In reply to: Pearsall, Jim: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Next in thread: Stephen Gill: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls and 802.1q trunking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|