Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps.
From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke@cisco.com)
Date: 11/22/02
- Next message: James Paterson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Previous message: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Next in thread: James Paterson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson@clavister.com> From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com> Date: Fri Nov 22 08:34:33 2002
At 10:50 22/11/2002 +0100, Mikael Olsson wrote:
>Eric Vyncke wrote:
>>
>> If you are concerned only by the waste of bandwidth, you may want to:
>> - block all incoming TCP connections but the really needed ones
>
>Um. That doesn't work for kazaa (fasttrack), gnutella, etc.
>These apps will detect if they're firewalled, and if two peers want
>to talk to eachother where one side is firewalled, the connection
>will always be initiated by the firewalled one.
Right, but my point was that those applications require at least one peer without firewall (= accepting incoming connection). So, blocking incoming connections will cut the bandwidth by at least 50% (as a lot of P2P users are behind NAT or firewalls)
>(And for public networks, every port is "needed" if you ask the users.)
Agreed, you then get what you want ;-)
-eric
- Next message: James Paterson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Previous message: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Next in thread: James Paterson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]