Re: [fw-wiz] Flat vs Segmented DMZ's
From: Luca Berra (bluca@comedia.it)
Date: 11/21/02
- Next message: Eric Vyncke: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Previous message: Frank Darden: "RE: [fw-wiz] Blocking Yahoo IM"
- In reply to: WhtWlf2001: "[fw-wiz] Flat vs Segmented DMZ's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Thu Nov 21 20:33:18 2002
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:28:52AM -0800, WhtWlf2001 wrote:
>I'm hoping to get some feedback (Pros/Cons) from the list members on a Flat vs. Segmented DMZ
>structure. We currently have about 20 hosts segmented off to 4-5 different DMZ interfaces on a CP
>firewall. With the exception of having a seperate MGMT DMZ, I'm curious about the
>benefits/detriments to having this segmented infrastructure. Today we offer only limited web
>services (http,ftp,owa) via the web.
Anyone has had any experience on using the Cisco 650x firewall blade to
obtain this?
-- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \
- Next message: Eric Vyncke: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port numbers for Peer to Peer file sharing apps."
- Previous message: Frank Darden: "RE: [fw-wiz] Blocking Yahoo IM"
- In reply to: WhtWlf2001: "[fw-wiz] Flat vs Segmented DMZ's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
