Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives
From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@wirex.com)
Date: 11/05/02
- Next message: Philip J. Koenig: "[fw-wiz] Interlopers on the WLAN"
- Previous message: Victoria of Borg: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- In reply to: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Next in thread: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Reply: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@wirex.com> To: George Capehart <capegeo@opengroup.org> Date: Tue Nov 5 11:07:16 2002
George Capehart wrote:
>This is interesting. So, a firewall really should/could/might be a
>multi-layer, multi-protocol switch . . .
>
But of course. That's all firewalls ever were, but marketing hates it
when people discover that :)
Crispin
-- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX http://wirex.com/~crispin/ Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Philip J. Koenig: "[fw-wiz] Interlopers on the WLAN"
- Previous message: Victoria of Borg: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- In reply to: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Next in thread: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Reply: George Capehart: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Primitives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]