Re: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in
From: R. DuFresne (dufresne@sysinfo.com)
Date: 10/28/02
- Next message: Todd Anderson: "[fw-wiz] sunscreen vs netbios"
- Previous message: rob.roberson@verizon.com: "Re: [fw-wiz] Iptables script"
- In reply to: Ryan M. Ferris: "Re: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in"
- Next in thread: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "R. DuFresne" <dufresne@sysinfo.com> To: "Ryan M. Ferris" <rferris@rmfdevelopment.com> Date: Mon Oct 28 08:18:02 2002
Or, in this case, a trivial drop via procmail, afterall, I'm guessing you
seldom send yourself e-mails, though, you might now and then, but, you can
still apply some filtering via procmail to limit this.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Ryan M. Ferris wrote:
> Sorry to have dashed out the message about my mail messages so quickly. Thanks for all the help. Comparing two headers (real) and (faked), it looks like the Message ID has been spoofed by IP address 172.195.75.206 using my mail server IP 161.58.164.17.
>
> I guess this counts as a trivial spoof best handled with the delete key.
>
> Ryan
>
>
> (Real)
> Received: from honor.trusecure.com (honor.trusecure.com [65.202.253.137]) by 161.58.164.17 (8.11.6) id g9S12i251039; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:02:44 -0700 (MST)
> Received: from honor.trusecure.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by honor.trusecure.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
> id 4D039730A; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:45:11 -0500 (EST)
> Delivered-To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Received: from 161.58.164.17 (rmfdevelopment.com [161.58.164.17])
> by honor.trusecure.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B229D733A
> for <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:50:53 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from RMFLaptop ([207.149.220.199]) by 161.58.164.17 (8.11.6) id g9RJ6aX71546; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:06:37 -0700 (MST)
> Message-ID: <001101c27deb$f1f3d2b0$c7dc95cf@RMFLaptop>
> From: "Ryan M. Ferris" <rferris@rmfdevelopment.com>
> To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210270936360.5826-100000@gargoyle.users.patriot.net>
>
> (faked)
> Received: from Key (ACC34BCE.ipt.aol.com [172.195.75.206]) by 161.58.164.17 (8.11.6) id g9QNTlo89547; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
> Message-Id: <200210262329.g9QNTlo89547@161.58.164.17>
> From: rferris <rferris@rmfdevelopment.com>
> To: rferris@rmfdevelopment.com
> Subject: End ImageReady Slices 120
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=P76X3G980M54iLT488z3s
> X-UIDL: M@G!!395!!K=`!!-n`!!
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts@patriot.net>
> To: "Ryan M. Ferris" <rferris@rmfdevelopment.com>
> Cc: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in
>
>
> > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Ryan M. Ferris wrote:
> >
> > > This is off topic. Someone is using my account to send me mail with binary
> > > attachments. I have contacted my provider and asked to change my mail
> > > password. I have sent on the message header to them. What is the next best
> > > step? Do I file a report with CERT? Any thoughts?
> >
> > When you say "Using my account," are you saying "the mail looks like it
> > comes from me," "the mail path is exactly the same and the message IDs
> > look like mine," "same path, different message IDs," or "heck if I know
> > what the deal is here?"
> >
> > If you post the full headers, we might have something to work with.
> >
> > Paul
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
> > proberts@patriot.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
> > probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessmnet TruSecure Corporation
> >
> >
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
-- Johnny Hart
testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!
- Next message: Todd Anderson: "[fw-wiz] sunscreen vs netbios"
- Previous message: rob.roberson@verizon.com: "Re: [fw-wiz] Iptables script"
- In reply to: Ryan M. Ferris: "Re: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in"
- Next in thread: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] appropriate response for mail break-in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|