Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS
From: Zen (zen@kill-9.it)
Date: 10/03/02
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] AIM"
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- In reply to: James X: "[fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Todd Underwood: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Jim MacLeod: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Zen <zen@kill-9.it> To: James X <scouser@paradise.net.nz> Date: Thu Oct 3 11:02:03 2002
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:29:21PM +1200, James X wrote:
> address or stack. I do not know of a way of acheiving this using linux
> or netBSD etc.. and without it I would feel rather vulnerable. To help
You can ifconfig the interface giving 0.0.0.0 address.
> mitigate it I am looking at hardware network taps (read only). These
> could be the answere but are not that cheap (kind of the whole idea).
Just crimp an ethernet cable with only the rx couple.
HTH,
-- My home isn't cluttered; it's "passage restrictive." zen@kill-9.it . Geek . And proud of it . http://www.kill-9.it/jargon/html/entry/zen.html
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] AIM"
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- In reply to: James X: "[fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Todd Underwood: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Jim MacLeod: "Re: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Reply: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] stealth ports and IDS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|