RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls
From: John Adams (jna-dated-1032203522.6b0d21@retina.net)
Date: 09/11/02
- Next message: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Previous message: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- In reply to: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Joe Matusiewicz <joem@nist.gov> From: John Adams <jna-dated-1032203522.6b0d21@retina.net> Date: Wed Sep 11 15:41:29 2002
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Joe Matusiewicz wrote:
> At 02:54 PM 9/11/02, John Adams wrote:
>
> >I had similiar problems with ntop. What I usually do is to filter out of
> >the traffic I deem useless with a tcpdump expression.
> >
> >For example, do you really need to know every DNS connection? Hell no,
> >filter that. Filter NNTP. Filter all SMTP that isn't bound for your main
> >mail server. Filter out NetBIOS.
>
> Actually, that wasn't an option. At the time I was most interested in
> bandwidth usage to decide on whether to get a bigger pipe. I needed to see
> the whole picture.
Ahh, I suppose MRTG didn't work out for you, then? It's a much better tool
for the job, but I bet you've already been told that. :)
-john
-- J. Adams http://www.retina.net/~jna Fiber line / Shine, Enlight the Globe / In Light, communicate / Connect. ~~ Lassigue Bendthaus - Fiber
- Next message: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Previous message: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- In reply to: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|