RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls
From: Christopher Hicks (chicks@chicks.net)
Date: 09/10/02
- Next message: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Previous message: Dominik Miklaszewski: "Re: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- In reply to: Noonan, Wesley: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Christopher Hicks <chicks@chicks.net> To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Tue Sep 10 15:56:00 2002
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Noonan, Wesley wrote:
> Since MRTG got tossed out, I figured I would add that there are
> numerous commercial ware products that can do this.
I've been looking at ntop ( http://www.ntop.org ) for protocol statistical
analysis. It looks like it does everything I could ever imagine wanting
for that sort of thing. Does anyone have any experience with it,
positive, negative or otherwise?
-- </chris> Camels may be nasty beasts, but they're the only way to get through the desert.
- Next message: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Previous message: Dominik Miklaszewski: "Re: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- In reply to: Noonan, Wesley: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Reply: Joe Matusiewicz: "RE: [fw-wiz] Statistics for Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]