Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )
From: B. Scott Harroff (Scott.Harroff@att.net)
Date: 08/26/02
- Next message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / proje ct mayhem )"
- Previous message: B. Scott Harroff: "Re: [fw-wiz] VPN concentrators"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "B. Scott Harroff" <Scott.Harroff@att.net> To: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts@patriot.net> Date: Mon Aug 26 11:14:25 2002
> Actually, I think it's not necessarily good to stop "folks like Jim-" the
> "bad apple" defense means you *must* stop Jim once he's reported.
> However, if you put in a mechanism and it has flaws, you could be more
> liable for the things that get through than you are if you don't try.
> Suddenly you've placed yourself in the position of an editor, and legally,
> not trying and not failing is different than trying and failing.
Your opinion is its better to do nothing and let 100% get though then though
a combination of technology / process / policy that stops 95%?
I think one would be better of showing "intent to protect and missing one
instance or two" than "doing nothing about a known problem".
- Next message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / proje ct mayhem )"
- Previous message: B. Scott Harroff: "Re: [fw-wiz] VPN concentrators"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Next in thread: Paul Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Reply: Paul Robertson: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "Re: RE:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|