RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless
From: Paul Robertson (proberts@patriot.net)
Date: 08/09/02
- Next message: Paul Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Previous message: ejb3@cornell.edu: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- In reply to: Scott, Richard: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Paul Robertson <proberts@patriot.net> To: "Scott, Richard" <Richard.Scott@BestBuy.com> Date: Fri Aug 9 15:04:30 2002
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Scott, Richard wrote:
> Why not restrict access via MAC addresses on the wireless cards? This would
> be a preventative measure.
That's only helpful for keeping people off a wireless network, not for
keeping wireless off a wired one. Let's say someone has a laptop with
802.11b built-in-- containing and controlling the perimeter gets more
difficult as the hardware transmits over multiple mediums.
Let's say your administrators are worried about layoffs and want to leave
themselves a WAP-enabled backdoor into the company network, or the sales
person who's been logged into the hotel/airport's wireless network on the
road comes back into the office-
I believe that there are better ways than doing periodic audits to
determine this- I'm just curious as to how others are approaching these
issues.
Thanks,
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts@patriot.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation
- Next message: Paul Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Previous message: ejb3@cornell.edu: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- In reply to: Scott, Richard: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Wireless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|