[fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?
From: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. (kdubuisson@kcmria.com)
Date: 08/01/02
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OpenSSH 3.4p1 possibly trojaned"
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "[fw-wiz] OpenSSH 3.4p1 possibly trojaned"
- Next in thread: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Maybe reply: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr.: "Fw: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr." <kdubuisson@kcmria.com> To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Thu Aug 1 08:20:01 2002
Hello all. I'm new to the list. I have a quick question: does the order in
which rules are added for an iptables table matter? I have a firewall that
has a pre-built iptables script that runs on boot. Once the system boots,
I'm trying to add additional rules to the default chains but my rules are
not working. I was wondering if that is because the boot script has, as
it's last rule, a DENY target and since it was "entered" before my new
rules, the DENY is always hit first.
Thanks in advance,
Kenny
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] OpenSSH 3.4p1 possibly trojaned"
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "[fw-wiz] OpenSSH 3.4p1 possibly trojaned"
- Next in thread: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Reply: Christopher Hicks: "Re: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Maybe reply: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr.: "Fw: [fw-wiz] Is the order of the rules entered in iptables important?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|